New York Times Slams OpenAI and Microsoft with Billion-Dollar Lawsuit Over AI Theft
In a bold move to safeguard its future, The New York Times has launched a federal lawsuit against tech giants OpenAI and Microsoft. The newspaper accuses them of jeopardizing its existence by utilizing its content to train AI chatbots, a practice the Times claims is tantamount to stealing billions of dollars’ worth of journalistic work.
A Clash of Titans: OpenAI & New York Times
The legal action, filed in Manhattan, comes after failed negotiations between the newspaper and the tech giants since April. The New York Times argues that the rapid evolution of AI, particularly OpenAI’s ChatGPT, poses a significant threat to the publishing industry, compounding the challenges posed by the migration of readers to online platforms.
AI’s Impact on Web Traffic
Web traffic is crucial for the Times, driving both advertising revenue and online subscriptions. The lawsuit contends that AI chatbots, by regurgitating Times’ content, divert traffic away from the paper, making it less likely for users to visit the original source for information.
Authors Unite Against AI
The New York Times isn’t alone in its battle. The lawsuit landscape is expanding, with 17 authors, including heavyweights like John Grisham and R.R. Martin, suing OpenAI for “systematic theft on a mass scale.” Concerns are growing among writers that AI programs are utilizing their copyrighted works without permission.
OpenAI’s Response
OpenAI defends its position, emphasizing its respect for content creators’ rights. The company expresses surprise and disappointment at the legal action, asserting that ongoing conversations with the Times have been productive. Microsoft, OpenAI’s partner and major backer, remains silent on the matter.
AI’s Information Gathering and Challenges
AI companies, including OpenAI and rival Anthropic, scrape information from online sources, including news articles, to train chatbots. Despite the significant investments and rapid development in AI technology, the lawsuit points out flaws. The Times cites an instance where OpenAI’s GPT-4 falsely attributed product recommendations to Wirecutter, the Times’ product reviews site.
The Growing Legal Battle
As lawsuits against OpenAI for copyright infringement multiply, the Times joins the fray seeking unspecified damages. The legal action aims to hold the tech companies accountable for the alleged misuse of its work and calls for the destruction of AI models or data sets incorporating its content.
Industry Response
The News/Media Alliance, representing over 2,200 news organizations, supports the Times’ legal action. The alliance emphasizes the need for collaboration between quality journalism and AI but asserts that using journalism without permission is unlawful.
AI’s Partnerships and Comparisons
In an interesting twist, OpenAI has secured partnerships with news entities like The Associated Press and Axel Springer, aiming to license news content for AI use. The Times draws parallels between its current situation and the copyright lawsuit against Napster two decades ago, suggesting that this legal battle could reshape the industry.
In a landscape where AI and journalism intersect, the outcome of this legal skirmish with The New York Times could have far-reaching implications for the future of news content and its relationship with artificial intelligence.
Related: